On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:18:58 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 08:11 -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I recall testing it with a fake driver and it was working. But I don't > > like it much. It's sad to have defined data structures to abstract > > things as much as possible and then end up with a hack like this one. I > > would prefer a more generic solution if we can come up with one. OTOH > > delaying lm-sensors 3.3.2 further just for this makes little sense. So, > > if you don't hear from me in the next 2 days, please just commit this > > fix and I'll release 3.3.2. > > More than two days, and I didn't hear anything, so I went ahead and > committed it. Thanks. This means we're about ready to release lm-sensors 3.3.2. If you have more pending patches, please commit them today. Tomorrow the repository will be considered frozen and we start the testing phase. Let's schedule the release for Monday, March 12th if this is OK with you. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
