On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:47:00PM -0500, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 09:03:05AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > I've reflowed your text into 80 columns. > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:31:48AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I suspect you might not get a lot of the acks you're waiting for as you > > > didn't CC folks... > > > I tried to add Cc: whenever there was a maintainer listed, but with > > that many patches I may have overlooked some. As for this one, you are > > the author, but you have not listed yourself as maintainer. Maybe you > > overlooked it, but how am I to know ? > > TBH given that I wrote the driver, work for the relevant silicon vendor > and am generally pretty active it seems odd that you would see the lack > of a MAINTAINERS entry as a lack of interest. The people who get > annoyed about getting CCed on stuff are those doing obviously generic > janatorial work rather than those who have spent time on the particular > bit of code - if you rely on MAINTAINERS you're going to miss a lot of > people. Mark, I don't see it as lack of interest. Sorry if you got that impression. But I don't keep a per-driver list of active people either, and I would need one for purposes like this one. It appears, given your input, that having such a list on top of MAINTAINERS would be good to have, so I'll start to create one now. This should ensure you (and hopefully others) won't be missed in the future. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
