Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/hwmon/via686a.c | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via686a.c b/drivers/hwmon/via686a.c index c759b1c..b376e7a 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/via686a.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via686a.c @@ -1,34 +1,35 @@ /* - via686a.c - Part of lm_sensors, Linux kernel modules - for hardware monitoring - - Copyright (c) 1998 - 2002 Frodo Looijaard <frodol@xxxxxx>, - Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@xxxxxxxxx>, - Mark Studebaker <mdsxyz123@xxxxxxxxx>, - and Bob Dougherty <bobd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - (Some conversion-factor data were contributed by Jonathan Teh Soon Yew - <j.teh@xxxxxxxxx> and Alex van Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx>.) - - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or - (at your option) any later version. - - This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. - - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software - Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. -*/ + * via686a.c - Part of lm_sensors, Linux kernel modules + * for hardware monitoring + * + * Copyright (c) 1998 - 2002 Frodo Looijaard <frodol@xxxxxx>, + * Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@xxxxxxxxx>, + * Mark Studebaker <mdsxyz123@xxxxxxxxx>, + * and Bob Dougherty <bobd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> + * + * (Some conversion-factor data were contributed by Jonathan Teh Soon Yew + * <j.teh@xxxxxxxxx> and Alex van Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx>.) + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or + * (at your option) any later version. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software + * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. + */ /* - Supports the Via VT82C686A, VT82C686B south bridges. - Reports all as a 686A. - Warning - only supports a single device. -*/ + * Supports the Via VT82C686A, VT82C686B south bridges. + * Reports all as a 686A. + * Warning - only supports a single device. + */ #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt @@ -47,8 +48,10 @@ #include <linux/io.h> -/* If force_addr is set to anything different from 0, we forcibly enable - the device at the given address. */ +/* + * If force_addr is set to anything different from 0, we forcibly enable + * the device at the given address. + */ static unsigned short force_addr; module_param(force_addr, ushort, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_addr, @@ -57,9 +60,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_addr, static struct platform_device *pdev; /* - The Via 686a southbridge has a LM78-like chip integrated on the same IC. - This driver is a customized copy of lm78.c -*/ + * The Via 686a southbridge has a LM78-like chip integrated on the same IC. + * This driver is a customized copy of lm78.c + */ /* Many VIA686A constants specified below */ @@ -91,40 +94,46 @@ static const u8 VIA686A_REG_TEMP_HYST[] = { 0x3a, 0x3e, 0x1e }; #define VIA686A_REG_ALARM2 0x42 #define VIA686A_REG_FANDIV 0x47 #define VIA686A_REG_CONFIG 0x40 -/* The following register sets temp interrupt mode (bits 1-0 for temp1, - 3-2 for temp2, 5-4 for temp3). Modes are: - 00 interrupt stays as long as value is out-of-range - 01 interrupt is cleared once register is read (default) - 10 comparator mode- like 00, but ignores hysteresis - 11 same as 00 */ +/* + * The following register sets temp interrupt mode (bits 1-0 for temp1, + * 3-2 for temp2, 5-4 for temp3). Modes are: + * 00 interrupt stays as long as value is out-of-range + * 01 interrupt is cleared once register is read (default) + * 10 comparator mode- like 00, but ignores hysteresis + * 11 same as 00 + */ #define VIA686A_REG_TEMP_MODE 0x4b /* We'll just assume that you want to set all 3 simultaneously: */ #define VIA686A_TEMP_MODE_MASK 0x3F #define VIA686A_TEMP_MODE_CONTINUOUS 0x00 -/* Conversions. Limit checking is only done on the TO_REG - variants. - -********* VOLTAGE CONVERSIONS (Bob Dougherty) ******** - From HWMon.cpp (Copyright 1998-2000 Jonathan Teh Soon Yew): - voltagefactor[0]=1.25/2628; (2628/1.25=2102.4) // Vccp - voltagefactor[1]=1.25/2628; (2628/1.25=2102.4) // +2.5V - voltagefactor[2]=1.67/2628; (2628/1.67=1573.7) // +3.3V - voltagefactor[3]=2.6/2628; (2628/2.60=1010.8) // +5V - voltagefactor[4]=6.3/2628; (2628/6.30=417.14) // +12V - in[i]=(data[i+2]*25.0+133)*voltagefactor[i]; - That is: - volts = (25*regVal+133)*factor - regVal = (volts/factor-133)/25 - (These conversions were contributed by Jonathan Teh Soon Yew - <j.teh@xxxxxxxxx>) */ +/* + * Conversions. Limit checking is only done on the TO_REG + * variants. + * + ******** VOLTAGE CONVERSIONS (Bob Dougherty) ******** + * From HWMon.cpp (Copyright 1998-2000 Jonathan Teh Soon Yew): + * voltagefactor[0]=1.25/2628; (2628/1.25=2102.4) // Vccp + * voltagefactor[1]=1.25/2628; (2628/1.25=2102.4) // +2.5V + * voltagefactor[2]=1.67/2628; (2628/1.67=1573.7) // +3.3V + * voltagefactor[3]=2.6/2628; (2628/2.60=1010.8) // +5V + * voltagefactor[4]=6.3/2628; (2628/6.30=417.14) // +12V + * in[i]=(data[i+2]*25.0+133)*voltagefactor[i]; + * That is: + * volts = (25*regVal+133)*factor + * regVal = (volts/factor-133)/25 + * (These conversions were contributed by Jonathan Teh Soon Yew + * <j.teh@xxxxxxxxx>) + */ static inline u8 IN_TO_REG(long val, int inNum) { - /* To avoid floating point, we multiply constants by 10 (100 for +12V). - Rounding is done (120500 is actually 133000 - 12500). - Remember that val is expressed in 0.001V/bit, which is why we divide - by an additional 10000 (100000 for +12V): 1000 for val and 10 (100) - for the constants. */ + /* + * To avoid floating point, we multiply constants by 10 (100 for +12V). + * Rounding is done (120500 is actually 133000 - 12500). + * Remember that val is expressed in 0.001V/bit, which is why we divide + * by an additional 10000 (100000 for +12V): 1000 for val and 10 (100) + * for the constants. + */ if (inNum <= 1) return (u8) SENSORS_LIMIT((val * 21024 - 1205000) / 250000, 0, 255); @@ -141,9 +150,11 @@ static inline u8 IN_TO_REG(long val, int inNum) static inline long IN_FROM_REG(u8 val, int inNum) { - /* To avoid floating point, we multiply constants by 10 (100 for +12V). - We also multiply them by 1000 because we want 0.001V/bit for the - output value. Rounding is done. */ + /* + * To avoid floating point, we multiply constants by 10 (100 for +12V). + * We also multiply them by 1000 because we want 0.001V/bit for the + * output value. Rounding is done. + */ if (inNum <= 1) return (long) ((250000 * val + 1330000 + 21024 / 2) / 21024); else if (inNum == 2) @@ -155,9 +166,11 @@ static inline long IN_FROM_REG(u8 val, int inNum) } /********* FAN RPM CONVERSIONS ********/ -/* Higher register values = slower fans (the fan's strobe gates a counter). - But this chip saturates back at 0, not at 255 like all the other chips. - So, 0 means 0 RPM */ +/* + * Higher register values = slower fans (the fan's strobe gates a counter). + * But this chip saturates back at 0, not at 255 like all the other chips. + * So, 0 means 0 RPM + */ static inline u8 FAN_TO_REG(long rpm, int div) { if (rpm == 0) @@ -170,37 +183,39 @@ static inline u8 FAN_TO_REG(long rpm, int div) ((val) * (div))) /******** TEMP CONVERSIONS (Bob Dougherty) *********/ -/* linear fits from HWMon.cpp (Copyright 1998-2000 Jonathan Teh Soon Yew) - if(temp<169) - return double(temp)*0.427-32.08; - else if(temp>=169 && temp<=202) - return double(temp)*0.582-58.16; - else - return double(temp)*0.924-127.33; - - A fifth-order polynomial fits the unofficial data (provided by Alex van - Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx>) a bit better. It also give more reasonable - numbers on my machine (ie. they agree with what my BIOS tells me). - Here's the fifth-order fit to the 8-bit data: - temp = 1.625093e-10*val^5 - 1.001632e-07*val^4 + 2.457653e-05*val^3 - - 2.967619e-03*val^2 + 2.175144e-01*val - 7.090067e+0. - - (2000-10-25- RFD: thanks to Uwe Andersen <uandersen@xxxxxxxxx> for - finding my typos in this formula!) - - Alas, none of the elegant function-fit solutions will work because we - aren't allowed to use floating point in the kernel and doing it with - integers doesn't provide enough precision. So we'll do boring old - look-up table stuff. The unofficial data (see below) have effectively - 7-bit resolution (they are rounded to the nearest degree). I'm assuming - that the transfer function of the device is monotonic and smooth, so a - smooth function fit to the data will allow us to get better precision. - I used the 5th-order poly fit described above and solved for - VIA register values 0-255. I *10 before rounding, so we get tenth-degree - precision. (I could have done all 1024 values for our 10-bit readings, - but the function is very linear in the useful range (0-80 deg C), so - we'll just use linear interpolation for 10-bit readings.) So, tempLUT - is the temp at via register values 0-255: */ +/* + * linear fits from HWMon.cpp (Copyright 1998-2000 Jonathan Teh Soon Yew) + * if(temp<169) + * return double(temp)*0.427-32.08; + * else if(temp>=169 && temp<=202) + * return double(temp)*0.582-58.16; + * else + * return double(temp)*0.924-127.33; + * + * A fifth-order polynomial fits the unofficial data (provided by Alex van + * Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx>) a bit better. It also give more reasonable + * numbers on my machine (ie. they agree with what my BIOS tells me). + * Here's the fifth-order fit to the 8-bit data: + * temp = 1.625093e-10*val^5 - 1.001632e-07*val^4 + 2.457653e-05*val^3 - + * 2.967619e-03*val^2 + 2.175144e-01*val - 7.090067e+0. + * + * (2000-10-25- RFD: thanks to Uwe Andersen <uandersen@xxxxxxxxx> for + * finding my typos in this formula!) + * + * Alas, none of the elegant function-fit solutions will work because we + * aren't allowed to use floating point in the kernel and doing it with + * integers doesn't provide enough precision. So we'll do boring old + * look-up table stuff. The unofficial data (see below) have effectively + * 7-bit resolution (they are rounded to the nearest degree). I'm assuming + * that the transfer function of the device is monotonic and smooth, so a + * smooth function fit to the data will allow us to get better precision. + * I used the 5th-order poly fit described above and solved for + * VIA register values 0-255. I *10 before rounding, so we get tenth-degree + * precision. (I could have done all 1024 values for our 10-bit readings, + * but the function is very linear in the useful range (0-80 deg C), so + * we'll just use linear interpolation for 10-bit readings.) So, tempLUT + * is the temp at via register values 0-255: + */ static const s16 tempLUT[] = { -709, -688, -667, -646, -627, -607, -589, -570, -553, -536, -519, -503, -487, -471, -456, -442, -428, -414, -400, -387, -375, @@ -226,27 +241,29 @@ static const s16 tempLUT[] = { 1276, 1301, 1326, 1352, 1378, 1406, 1434, 1462 }; -/* the original LUT values from Alex van Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx> - (for via register values 12-240): -{-50,-49,-47,-45,-43,-41,-39,-38,-37,-35,-34,-33,-32,-31, --30,-29,-28,-27,-26,-25,-24,-24,-23,-22,-21,-20,-20,-19,-18,-17,-17,-16,-15, --15,-14,-14,-13,-12,-12,-11,-11,-10,-9,-9,-8,-8,-7,-7,-6,-6,-5,-5,-4,-4,-3, --3,-2,-2,-1,-1,0,0,1,1,1,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,9,10,10,11,11,12, -12,12,13,13,13,14,14,15,15,16,16,16,17,17,18,18,19,19,20,20,21,21,21,22,22, -22,23,23,24,24,25,25,26,26,26,27,27,27,28,28,29,29,30,30,30,31,31,32,32,33, -33,34,34,35,35,35,36,36,37,37,38,38,39,39,40,40,41,41,42,42,43,43,44,44,45, -45,46,46,47,48,48,49,49,50,51,51,52,52,53,53,54,55,55,56,57,57,58,59,59,60, -61,62,62,63,64,65,66,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,83,84, -85,86,88,89,91,92,94,96,97,99,101,103,105,107,109,110}; - - - Here's the reverse LUT. I got it by doing a 6-th order poly fit (needed - an extra term for a good fit to these inverse data!) and then - solving for each temp value from -50 to 110 (the useable range for - this chip). Here's the fit: - viaRegVal = -1.160370e-10*val^6 +3.193693e-08*val^5 - 1.464447e-06*val^4 - - 2.525453e-04*val^3 + 1.424593e-02*val^2 + 2.148941e+00*val +7.275808e+01) - Note that n=161: */ +/* + * the original LUT values from Alex van Kaam <darkside@xxxxxxxxx> + * (for via register values 12-240): + * {-50,-49,-47,-45,-43,-41,-39,-38,-37,-35,-34,-33,-32,-31, + * -30,-29,-28,-27,-26,-25,-24,-24,-23,-22,-21,-20,-20,-19,-18,-17,-17,-16,-15, + * -15,-14,-14,-13,-12,-12,-11,-11,-10,-9,-9,-8,-8,-7,-7,-6,-6,-5,-5,-4,-4,-3, + * -3,-2,-2,-1,-1,0,0,1,1,1,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,9,10,10,11,11,12, + * 12,12,13,13,13,14,14,15,15,16,16,16,17,17,18,18,19,19,20,20,21,21,21,22,22, + * 22,23,23,24,24,25,25,26,26,26,27,27,27,28,28,29,29,30,30,30,31,31,32,32,33, + * 33,34,34,35,35,35,36,36,37,37,38,38,39,39,40,40,41,41,42,42,43,43,44,44,45, + * 45,46,46,47,48,48,49,49,50,51,51,52,52,53,53,54,55,55,56,57,57,58,59,59,60, + * 61,62,62,63,64,65,66,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,83,84, + * 85,86,88,89,91,92,94,96,97,99,101,103,105,107,109,110}; + * + * + * Here's the reverse LUT. I got it by doing a 6-th order poly fit (needed + * an extra term for a good fit to these inverse data!) and then + * solving for each temp value from -50 to 110 (the useable range for + * this chip). Here's the fit: + * viaRegVal = -1.160370e-10*val^6 +3.193693e-08*val^5 - 1.464447e-06*val^4 + * - 2.525453e-04*val^3 + 1.424593e-02*val^2 + 2.148941e+00*val +7.275808e+01) + * Note that n=161: + */ static const u8 viaLUT[] = { 12, 12, 13, 14, 14, 15, 16, 16, 17, 18, 18, 19, 20, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, @@ -263,9 +280,11 @@ static const u8 viaLUT[] = { 239, 240 }; -/* Converting temps to (8-bit) hyst and over registers - No interpolation here. - The +50 is because the temps start at -50 */ +/* + * Converting temps to (8-bit) hyst and over registers + * No interpolation here. + * The +50 is because the temps start at -50 + */ static inline u8 TEMP_TO_REG(long val) { return viaLUT[val <= -50000 ? 0 : val >= 110000 ? 160 : @@ -293,8 +312,10 @@ static inline long TEMP_FROM_REG10(u16 val) #define DIV_FROM_REG(val) (1 << (val)) #define DIV_TO_REG(val) ((val) == 8 ? 3 : (val) == 4 ? 2 : (val) == 1 ? 0 : 1) -/* For each registered chip, we need to keep some data in memory. - The structure is dynamically allocated. */ +/* + * For each registered chip, we need to keep some data in memory. + * The structure is dynamically allocated. + */ struct via686a_data { unsigned short addr; const char *name; @@ -785,10 +806,11 @@ static struct via686a_data *via686a_update_device(struct device *dev) via686a_read_value(data, VIA686A_REG_TEMP_HYST[i]); } - /* add in lower 2 bits - temp1 uses bits 7-6 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW1 - temp2 uses bits 5-4 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW23 - temp3 uses bits 7-6 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW23 + /* + * add in lower 2 bits + * temp1 uses bits 7-6 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW1 + * temp2 uses bits 5-4 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW23 + * temp3 uses bits 7-6 of VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW23 */ data->temp[0] |= (via686a_read_value(data, VIA686A_REG_TEMP_LOW1) @@ -908,7 +930,8 @@ static int __devinit via686a_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, if (via686a_device_add(address)) goto exit_unregister; - /* Always return failure here. This is to allow other drivers to bind + /* + * Always return failure here. This is to allow other drivers to bind * to this pci device. We don't really want to have control over the * pci device, we only wanted to read as few register values from it. */ -- 1.7.5.4 _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors