Hi Bjoern, On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:04:54PM -0500, Bjoern Gerhart wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > so for solving the other issues you mentioned, I'd first apply your > set of 4 patches on the original f75375s. Then I'd implement my f75387 > related modifications within your latest review proposals, test the > resulting binary module on my f75387 hardware and then create a fifth > patch. > > Would that order lead to a valid set of patches? > Yes, that would be the best way to proceed, only it is 5 patches by now. Did I copy you on the last one ? If you use git, it should be straightforward to merge your patch on top of mine. I would have done that, only I had trouble applying yours because it was somehow corrupted. Of course, it would also help tremendously if you would fine the time to review my patches :). Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
