Hello, I tried in rewriting the driver... but I can't understand the right way... since sb800 is a southbus, the mux driver must be defined as i2c_device, platform_device, or pci_device? I tried using i2c_device structure, but I can't make sb800 to match the id_Table.. I tried usign pci_device structure, but the driver overwrite the pci space so kernel hangs... Regards, Eddi. On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Eddi, > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 17:42:16 +0100, Eddi De Pieri wrote: >> Actually I don't have a development system with latest git. I build my >> patch on my debian with 2.6.32 kernel.. >> >> The patch is based on i2c-amd756-s4882.c and adapted to work with sb8xx... >> >> i2c-amd756-s4882.c is still present and don't use i2c-mux infrastructure. > > That's because i2c-amd756-s4882.c was written before the i2c-mux > infrastructure was available. Ideally SMBus multiplexing support on the > Tyan S4882 would be converted to i2c-mux (i.e. i2c-amd756-s4882.c would > be deleted and the multiplexer would be instantiated in i2c-amd756.c > itself, based on DMI data.) This shouldn't be particularly difficult, > the real difficulty is to find someone with one of these boards to test > the changes. > >> However if you are interested in porting my work to latest git, you >> will be welcome! > > That's not how it works, sorry. Submissions must be based on a recent > kernel in order to be accepted upstream. If you want SMBus multiplexing > support on your system, it will have to be based on i2c-mux, because > that's how things work now. Otherwise I will not accept your code. > > -- > Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors