On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:14:16 -0200, Gustavo De Nardin (spuk) wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 00:44 -0400, Frank T. Lofaro Jr. wrote: >> > > This patch allows the ITE 8728 chip to be detected and used. >> > > The chip appears to be compatible with the 8721. >> > > >> > >> > Can anyone confirm that those chips are actually compatible ? >> >> Unlike forcing the other chips' ids, with force_id=0x8721 PWM control seems >> to work reasonably, with pwm1_enable=1, pwm1=0 yields around 1132 RPM on the >> CPU fan, and pwm1=255 yields around 3260 RPM. Should pwm1=0 actually stop >> the fan? I get what (empirically) seem to be consistent logarithmic >> increase in RPM when increasing pwm1 value, anyway. > > If this is a 4-wire fan then your results are expected. pwm=0 always > stops 3-wire fans (no power -> stopped) but typically 4-wire fans have > a minimum speed (speed control is separate from power.) > >> But the sensors values read with 'it87 force_id=0x8721' don't seem ok, I get >> this (first 'it87 force_id=0x8721', then 'asus_atk0110 new_if=1', which >> seems to provide good readings): Please send me the output of "dmidecode -t 2" so I can override the default detection logic... this will allow the driver (atk0110) to work out of the box on your board. >> atk0110-acpi-0 >> Adapter: ACPI interface >> Vcore Voltage: +0.95 V (min = +0.80 V, max = +1.60 V) >> +3.3V Voltage: +3.34 V (min = +2.97 V, max = +3.63 V) >> +5V Voltage: +5.13 V (min = +4.50 V, max = +5.50 V) >> +12V Voltage: +12.11 V (min = +10.20 V, max = +13.80 V) >> CPU Fan Speed: 3276 RPM (min = 600 RPM) >> Chassis Fan Speed: 0 RPM (min = 600 RPM) >> CPU Temperature: +33.0°C (high = +60.0°C, crit = +95.0°C) >> MB Temperature: +40.0°C (high = +45.0°C, crit = +75.0°C) > > This isn't necessarily bad. It is expected that you need voltage > scaling for the it87 which you don't need for the atk0110 interface. > AFAIK it is also expected that the limits aren't set as the atk0110 > interface uses its own software limits (Luca can you please confirm?) Sort of. On older models the BIOS did program the limits, my best guess about newer boards is that the EC does some kind of polling. Luca _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
