Re: A new Subsystem for Current Management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:54:26 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:13:02PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > While the regulator subsystem presents itself as aiming at power
> > savings to improve battery life, it doesn't seem fundamentally
> > different from the need you described. Whether you lower current draw
> > to save battery life or to prevent the hardware from dying, makes
> > little difference, the underlying mechanisms should be pretty similar.
> 
> Actually the regulator API isn't really about power savings - it's about
> voltage and current regulation.  Higher layers can use these features to
> save power but it's not somethnig the regulator API cares about.  If the
> documentation suggests it is we might want to fix that up.

I came up to this conclusion after reading the CONFIG_REGULATOR help
text in Kconfig. I'll let you decide if this should get improved in any
way.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux