Hi Durga, On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:36:50 +0530, R, Durgadoss wrote: > I have the CPU model of the next generation Atom based Core. > Can we add this also in the list here ? > If you don't find time, I can add the one liner, after this gets in. > > ) > > + 0x1a (Nehalem), 0x1c (Atom), 0x1e (Lynnfield), > > + 0x26 (Tunnel Creek Atom) > > 0x27 (Medfield Atom) and TjMax 90 I can add it, no problem. Is TjMax the same for all Medfield-based Atom CPUs? If so, and if it can't be read from MSR_TEMPERATURE_TARGET, then this value shouldn't go in the documentation file but in the driver, unless the fragile heuristic we have already comes to that conclusion (it's so complex that honestly I can't tell.) > > > Datasheet: Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual > > Volume 3A: System Programming Guide > > http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/Wiki/Mobility/720.htm > > @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ Process Processor > > TjMax(C) > > N475/470/455/450 100 > > N280/270 90 > > 330/230 125 > > + E660 90 > > + E660T 110 > > > > 45nm Core2 Processors -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
