Re: adjusting /etc/sensors.conf for a dual processor machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:10:17 -0700 (PDT), Audio Phile wrote:
> Ah!  I didn't read the output carefully.  If you notice, the "core id" is what is causing this, nothing wrong with lm-sensors here.

Indeed, the unexpected core IDs come straight from /proc/cpuinfo.

> We can I think blame HP.  Next question would be how to get this on to the lm-sensors wiki so that other HP Z600 users can make this addition to their configs if necessary.

What makes you think the system vendor has anything to do with this? I
would expect the core IDs to be reported by the CPU itself (someone
please correct me if I'm wrong.)

> $ grep "core id" cpuinfo.txt
> core id        : 0
> core id        : 1
> core id        : 9
> core id        : 10
> core id        : 0
> core id        : 1
> core id        : 9
> core id        : 10
> core id        : 0
> core id        : 1
> core id        : 9
> core id        : 10
> core id        : 0
> core id        : 1
> core id        : 9
> core id        : 10

I have no idea if the CPU is just reporting strange values or if the
kernel is somehow misbehaving.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux