Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] hwmon: (pmbus) Add comments explaining internal driver API return values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jean,

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:01:44AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:19:02 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Return values for functions reading/writing manufacturer specific registers are
> > poorly explained. Add comments to improve documentation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> > index a6ae20f..da90167 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> > @@ -134,8 +134,16 @@
> >   * Semantics:
> >   * Virtual registers are all word size.
> >   * READ registers are read-only; writes are either ignored or return an error.
> > - * RESET registers are read/write. Reading returns zero (used for detection),
> > - * writing any value causes the associated history to be reset.
> > + * RESET registers are read/write. Reading reset registers returns zero
> > + * (used for detection), writing any value causes the associated history to be
> > + * reset.
> > + * Virtual registers have to be handled in device specific driver code. Chip
> > + * driver code returns non-negative register values if a virtual register is
> > + * supported, or a negative error code if not. The chip driver may return
> > + * -ENODATA or any other error code in this case, though an error code other
> > + * than -ENODATA is handled more efficiently and thus preferred. Either case,
> > + * the calling PMBus core code will abort if the chip driver returns an error
> > + * code when reading or writing virtual registers.
> 
> The explanation below suggests that the code doesn't actually abort in
> the -ENODATA case, but instead falls back to an alternative register
> access?
> 
Correct, except if -ENODATA is returned for virtual registers.

I'll add some more text to the documentation to describe how the access works 
in more detail.

> >   */
> >  #define PMBUS_VIRT_BASE			0x100
> >  #define PMBUS_VIRT_READ_TEMP_MIN	(PMBUS_VIRT_BASE + 0)
> > @@ -320,6 +328,12 @@ struct pmbus_driver_info {
> >  	 * The following functions map manufacturing specific register values
> >  	 * to PMBus standard register values. Specify only if mapping is
> >  	 * necessary.
> > +	 * Function return the register value (read) or zero (write) if
> 
> "Functions return" or "Function returns".
> 
Functions return

> > +	 * successful. A return value of -ENODATA indicates that there is no
> > +	 * manufacturer specific register, but that a standard PMBus register
> > +	 * may exist. Any other negative return value indicates that the
> > +	 * register does not exist, and that no attempt should be made to read
> > +	 * the standard register.
> >  	 */
> >  	int (*read_byte_data)(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg);
> >  	int (*read_word_data)(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg);
> 
> Other than this, looks good, thanks for adding this piece of
> documentation.
> 
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
Thanks a lot for the review!

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux