On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > The optional extended local temperature register can never have > address 0, as this address is already used by another register. Thus > we can get rid of flag LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT and simply rely on > reg_local_ext being non-zero to determine if a given chip has this > extension or not. This makes the code more simple. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stijn Devriendt <sdevrien@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied (with the max6657 fix applied to the original patch breaking it). Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
