On 07/22/2011 09:41 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> This does involve additional use of the spin lock in idr.c.
> Is this an issue?
>
Actually it looks like a bug fix. I had a TODO: to add one.
> Also, some error mangling was needed to keep the interface
> the same. Does this matter or can we return -ENOSPC instead
> of -EBUSY?
>
Na. -ENOSPC is just fine. All the osd Application just check for
"any error" not a specific one.
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
Ack-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
> index b31a8e3..fa849bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void __remove(struct device *dev)
>
> if (oud->disk)
> put_disk(oud->disk);
> - ida_remove(&osd_minor_ida, oud->minor);
> + ida_simple_remove(&osd_minor_ida, oud->minor);
>
> kfree(oud);
> }
> @@ -403,18 +403,12 @@ static int osd_probe(struct device *dev)
> if (scsi_device->type != TYPE_OSD)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - do {
> - if (!ida_pre_get(&osd_minor_ida, GFP_KERNEL))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - error = ida_get_new(&osd_minor_ida, &minor);
> - } while (error == -EAGAIN);
> -
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - if (minor >= SCSI_OSD_MAX_MINOR) {
> - error = -EBUSY;
> - goto err_retract_minor;
> + minor = ida_simple_get(&osd_minor_ida, 0,
> + SCSI_OSD_MAX_MINOR, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (minor < 0) {
> + if (minor == -ENOSPC)
> + return -EBUSY;
Just drop the translation is fine as well
> + return minor;
> }
>
> error = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -491,7 +485,7 @@ err_free_osd:
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> kfree(oud);
> err_retract_minor:
> - ida_remove(&osd_minor_ida, minor);
> + ida_simple_remove(&osd_minor_ida, minor);
> return error;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
