Hi,
On 7/4/2011 9:33 AM, Kazuya wrote:
Hello,
I am a bit stuck currently. I would like to know if you can help me. I
would like to access to the temperature of my processor. That what I
have already done ..
If you need more information I can send everything you want.
My system :
root@teddy:~# uname -a
*Linux teddy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux***
Other information :
Shuttle SH67H3 – i5 2300
The last version of sensors detect gives :
root@teddy:~# perl sensors-detect
*# sensors-detect revision 5981 (2011-07-03 13:57:57 +0200)*
*# System: Shuttle SH67H3*
*# Board: Shuttle FH67*
**
*This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need*
*to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe*
*and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,*
*unless you know what you're doing.*
**
*Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.*
*Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): yes*
*Module cpuid loaded successfully.*
*Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No*
*VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No*
*VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No*
*AMD K8 thermal sensors... No*
*AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No*
*AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No*
*AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No*
*AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No*
*AMD Family 15h power sensors... No*
*Intel digital thermal sensor... Success!*
*(driver `coretemp')*
*Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No*
*VIA C7 thermal sensor... No*
*VIA Nano thermal sensor... No*
**
*Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to*
*standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.*
*Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): yes*
*Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f*
*Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No*
*Trying family `SMSC'... No*
*Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No*
*Trying family `ITE'... Yes*
*Found `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' Success!*
*(address 0xa30, driver `to-be-written')*
*Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f*
*Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No*
*Trying family `SMSC'... No*
*Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No*
*Trying family `ITE'... No*
**
*Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces*
*through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.*
*We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it*
*there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such*
*interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI*
*interfaces? (YES/no): yes*
*Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No*
*Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No*
**
*Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.*
*We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually*
*safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any*
*ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): yes*
*Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No*
*Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No*
*Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No*
*Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No*
**
*Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware*
*monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works*
*reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble*
*on some systems.*
*Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): yes*
*Using driver `i2c-i801' for device 0000:00:1f.3: Intel Cougar Point (PCH)*
**
*Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at f040 (i2c-0)*
*Do you want to scan it? (yes/NO/selectively): yes*
*Client found at address 0x50*
*Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'*
*(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)*
*Client found at address 0x52*
*Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'*
*(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)*
**
*Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.*
*Just press ENTER to continue:*
**
*Driver `to-be-written':*
** ISA bus, address 0xa30*
*Chip `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)*
**
*Driver `coretemp':*
** Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)*
**
*Note: there is no driver for ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors yet.*
*Check http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices for updates.*
**
*Do you want to overwrite /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no): yes*
*Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors*
*for initialization at boot time.*
*You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required*
*kernel modules.*
**
*Unloading cpuid... OK*
root@ted:~# modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721
*FATAL: Error inserting it87
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/it87.ko): No such device*
As you told me I tried modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721
IT8772E yes LPC (2011-06-10) Found on Foxconn and Shuttle H67 boards. No
datasheet yet. One request (Boris Hajduk). Support can probably be added
to the it87 driver. Try "modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721" and report.
Thank you,
Do not hesitate to ask me any question if you want !
What distribution is this?
What is the output from the 'sensors -v' command? That should display
what version of LM_Sensors is installed and what libsensors library
version is used.
What is the output from the 'sensors' command? If the necessary drivers
have properly loaded, that command will display various outputs.
The 'it87' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly installed.
Also, the 'coretemp' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly
installed. Did you attempt to "modprobe coretemp" and observe what happened?
Did you attempt to start the lm_sensors service to load the required
modules? If you tried to start the service, what did you observe?
To monitor CPU temperatures on an Intel CPU, the 'coretemp' driver from
LM_Sensors can do the job.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
