Re: coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU (TunnelCreek)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 12:40 -0400, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> > I thought about replacing the manual TjMax detection code with code
> > using the model string to take care of problems like this - essentially
> > by providing a table with entries { model string, Tjmax } for each CPU
> > with Tjmax other than 100 degrees C. This way we could get rid of some
> > of the odd code we have today. Would that make sense ?
> 
> I completely agree with you here.
> This way, a lot of code in get_tjmax will be reduced, by just
> a search through some array.
>  
Unfortunately, looking at Alexander's /proc/cpuinfo output, it looks
like the E6xx chips have no mention of E6xx in the CPU ID string, which
unfortunately kills the idea. 

Do you know if there is _any_ means to distinguish E6xx from E6xxT ?

Thanks,
Guenter



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux