On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:50:37AM -0400, Alexander Stein wrote: > On Thursday 23 June 2011 11:33:16 Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:14:52 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote: > > > Well, I noticed that. But I went the way lm95241 does. I'm also unsure > > > which interval to choose, if user specify a unsupported interval. Choose > > > the next small or the next greater one? Maybe you can give me a hint > > > here. > > > > BTW, is the LM95245 so incompatible that support couldn't be added to > > the lm95241 driver? If both devices are compatible to a reasonable > > degree, a single driver would be preferred. > > Well, the register mapping is completly different. Also some configuration > bits are merged and moved into other registers than in lm95241. I doubt there > is much more compatibility than i2c transfers and temperature format (despite > unsigned/unsigned). > Same conclusion here. Odd but true. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
