Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: (sht15) general code clean-up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/11/11 20:03, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Excerpts from Jonathan Cameron's message of 2011-04-08 14:17:54 -0400:
>> My one question on this is in the header.  Why the extra indent?
>> Maybe it looks a smigeon clearer but I'm far from convinced by that
>> bit.
> 
> The extra indentation in the clean-up patch is made to align the
> existing attributes (or macros) with the new ones introduced in the
> following patchs, which have longer names (such as
> SHT15_STATUS_LOW_BATTERY or last_measurement).
Fair enough. It might ideally have occurred in that patch as then the
reason would have been obvious!

Still, it's to early in the morning and I'm just being fussy ;)


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux