On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:59:22 +0200, Tomàs Deltell Bonell wrote: > I was using the Guenter's driver. But last night I tried your driver and > compiled correctly. This is the result: These are essentially the same driver, both are based on the kernel version, with support for new chips added. > > $ sensors > w83667hg-isa-0290 > Adapter: ISA adapter > in0: +1.14 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) > in1: +0.59 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in2: +3.42 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in3: +3.42 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in4: +1.31 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in5: +1.29 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in7: +3.47 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > in8: +3.20 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1) > fan2: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1) > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1) > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1) > temp1: +54.0°C (high = +0.0°C, hyst = +0.0°C) ALARM sensor = diode > temp2: +53.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = diode > temp3: +67.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = diode > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V > > coretemp-isa-0000 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 0: +22.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) > > coretemp-isa-0001 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 1: +31.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) > > Temperatures of the new adapter is displayed correctly (in accordance > with the information that BIOS shows) Great. > These are the results that should be shown? You'd get a better output with the latest version of the default configuration file: http://www.lm-sensors.org/export/5959/lm-sensors/trunk/etc/sensors.conf.default The missing fan speeds is surprising too, as are the divisor values of 1. Maybe the driver will increase them on later reads, and at some point you get valid fan speed readings? Unless this is a fanless system of course. But anyway, these days Guenter's copy of the driver is ahead of mine for the chip you have, so you should really be using his driver, not mine, until I merge his code (that's on my to-do list, but has low priority.) > There are any plan to include support for these chips on lm-sensors? Support is already in the upstream kernel. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
