Hi Jean, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:23:58AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andrew, > [ ... ] > > + > > +/* Register Addresses */ > > +#define LOCAL_TEMP_RD 0x00 > > +#define EXT_HI_TEMP_RD 0x01 > > +#define EXT_LO_TEMP_RD 0x10 > > +#define STATUS_RD 0x02 > > +#define CONFIG_RD 0x03 > > + > > +#define CONFIG_WR 0x09 > > +#define CONV_RATE_WR 0x0A > > +#define LOCAL_TEMP_HI_LIMIT_WR 0x0B > > +#define EXT_TEMP_HI_LIMIT_HI_BYTE 0x0D > > +#define OFFSET_WR 0x11 > > +#define EXT_THERM_LIMIT_WR 0x19 > > +#define LOCAL_THERM_LIMIT_WR 0x20 > > +#define THERM_HYSTERESIS_WR 0x21 > > These register definitions look very familiar to me. Have you looked at > the lm90 driver to check has difficult it would be to add support for > the NCT1008? I bet it will only take a few lines of code. > After I spent a couple of hours reviewing the driver, I noticed that the chip is functionally identical to ADT7461A (the only difference is the package; even the chip ID is the same), and the ADT7461A is in turn functionally identical to ADT7461. Sigh :(. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
