Re: RFC: nct6776f support in the w83627ehf and fan RPMsignal de-bounce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ian,

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:20:23AM -0500, Ian Dobson wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Guenter Roeck" <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:06 AM
> To: "Robert Kaiser" <kairo@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  RFC: nct6776f support in the w83627ehf and fan 
> RPMsignal de-bounce
> 
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:45:30PM -0500, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >> > fan1:                    0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM, div = 64)
> >> > fan2:                 1110 RPM  (min =    0 RPM, div = 32)  ALARM
> >> > fan3:                    0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM, div = 64)
> >> > fan4:                    0 RPM  (div = 64)
> >> >
> > [ ... ]
> >> Looks reasonable. There is one problem which I had wondered about - the 
> >> ALARM
> >> which tends to show up for running fans.
> >>
> >> I finally tracked that down. Turns out the chip has a "maximum RPM" 
> >> register.
> >> Apparently that register is not set, which causes the alarm.
> >>
> > Actually, I am not sure if I got that right. Can you set the minimum speed 
> > of fan2
> > to something larger than 1110 rpm and check if that causes ALARM to go off 
> > ?
> >
> > I suspect I might have misinterpreted the meaning of "Fan Count Limit". I 
> > thought
> > it is the low limit, but it might well be the high limit.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lm-sensors mailing list
> > lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> 
> Are you sure, on my nct6776f the fan alarming appears to work correctly:-
> HD:           532 RPM  (min =  200 RPM)
> CPU:         1043 RPM  (min =  500 RPM)
> Case Back:    990 RPM  (min =  500 RPM)
> Case Front:   765 RPM  (min =  500 RPM)
> fan5:           0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)  ALARM
> 
> note those are exactly the minimum values I've entered into sensors3.conf 
> and when the fan speed drops below these values I see an alarm.
> 
Obviously not ;). But there must be a reason for those ALARM responses.
You point me into the direction, though: Robert's output includes div,
meaning it looks like he does not have an nct6776f after all.

So first question is what chip he has.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux