On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:15:16PM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: [ ... ] > > > > Looks good, only I wonder if there would be a means to specify that only one of > > SENSORS_LIS3_SPI, SENSORS_LIS3_I2C, or HP_ACCEL is valid at any given time. > > SENSORS_LIS3_SPI and HP_ACCEL are already mutually exclusive (they > depend on !ACPI and ACPI respectively, and ACPI is a boolean.) I am not > sure if they should also be exclusive with SENSORS_LIS3_I2C... In fact I > don't think the exclusive access should be handled at build time, it > would better be handled at run-time, and preferably on a per-device > basis. > > But more importantly, my patches do _not_ change anything here. I left > things the way they were. > Makes sense. Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
