On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:28:32AM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > I suspect that the "lis3lv02d" driver name is a legacy from before > the split into several modules. Use a specific name for the hp_accel > driver, for better error messages and easier investigation of issues. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Piel <eric.piel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Not tested due to lack of hardware. > > drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-2.6.38-rc5.orig/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c 2011-02-19 13:28:46.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.38-rc5/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c 2011-02-19 13:39:49.000000000 +0100 > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ > #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> > #include "../../misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.h" > > -#define DRIVER_NAME "lis3lv02d" > +#define DRIVER_NAME "hp_accel" > #define ACPI_MDPS_CLASS "accelerometer" > Not sure if you can do that, given the close interrelation with lis3lv02d.c. That really asks for testing on a real system. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
