09.02.2011 13:19, Jean Delvare ÐÐÑÐÑ:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:48:51 +0300, Owl wrote: > gentoo ~ # uname -a > Linux gentoo 2.6.36-gentoo-r7 #1 SMP Fri Jan 14 14:34:23 MSK 2011 i686 > Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N550 @ 1.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux > > gentoo ~ # sensors > coretemp-isa-0000 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 0: +18.0ÂC (crit = +100.0ÂC) > > coretemp-isa-0001 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 1: +22.0ÂC (crit = +100.0ÂC) > > gentoo ~ # modprobe acpi_cpufreq > gentoo ~ # sensors > coretemp-isa-0000 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 0: +37.0ÂC (crit = +100.0ÂC) > > coretemp-isa-0001 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Core 1: +41.0ÂC (crit = +100.0ÂC) > > It's normal? Definitely not. > I think, second output is much closer to BIOS values. This reminds me of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17291 That case was a little different (problem was reportedly introduced by cpuidle drivers, rather than solved by cpufreq) but both share the fact that apparently digital thermal sensors in Intel CPUs are very sensitive to the CPU state. The root cause may be the same. Len, any idea how to investigate and hopefully fix this?
Additional info, maybe it help: dmesg: http://codepad.org/2CXxLyLv kernel config: http://codepad.org/vBsXFiXM lsmod: http://codepad.org/NY7SixKo _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
