Re: [PATCH] lis33: turn down the no IRQ message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:19:20AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Basically though if dev->irq is not set it means there is no IRQ, and
> > > that isn't neccessarily an error.
> > > 
> > Difference is developer knowledge (no irq) vs. user understanding. Sure, no irq 
> > implies no freefall, and that is not an error. However, the user won't know that,
> > and thus might appreciate a note.
> 
> Unfortunately what happens is the user of the case it's not an error gets
> a big scary message and panics thinking the device is broken.
> 
Hmm ... ok, I'll accept that, and redirect any resulting support cases to you ;).

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux