On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 17:26 -0500, Anish Patel wrote: > On 01/17/11 16:54, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:26 -0500, DarkNovaNick@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> I recently bought the new Intel Sandy Bridge processor, i5-2500k, > >> along with a Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H motherboard. I've used lm_sensors > >> in the past and am trying to get it to work with my new setup (on > >> Ubuntu 10.10 kernel 2.6.35-24). I downloaded the latest version of the > >> sensors-detect script from the website and it was not able to find any > >> sensors. Here is the output: > >> > >> --------- > >> > >> # sensors-detect revision 5901 (2011-01-14 17:11:54 +0100) > >> # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67A-UD3H > >> > >> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need > >> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe > >> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions, > >> unless you know what you're doing. > >> > >> Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded > >> sensors. > >> Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): > >> Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No > >> VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No > >> VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No > >> AMD K8 thermal sensors... No > >> AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No > >> AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No > >> Intel Core family thermal sensor... No > >> Intel Atom thermal sensor... No > >> Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No > >> VIA C7 thermal sensor... No > >> VIA Nano thermal sensor... No > >> > >> Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to > >> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe. > >> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): > >> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f > >> Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No > >> Trying family `SMSC'... No > >> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No > >> Trying family `ITE'... Yes > >> Found unknown chip with ID 0x8728 > >> (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors) > > The problem is more likely that the SuperIO chip used in your system is > > not supported. If so, your problem doesn't have anything to do with > > SandyBridge. > > > > Guenter > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lm-sensors mailing list > > lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors > > > i think the more likely problem is that his kernel doesn't know about > the sandy bridge thermal diode. > the coretemp module probably needs an update. > The coretemp driver checks CPU registers to determine if the CPU supports thermal sensors or not; Sandy Bridge specific changes should not be necessary for this to work. Maybe it would help to simply enter "modprobe coretemp". Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
