On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:22:32 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:19:10AM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Please double-check the value of MAX_SUBFEATURES after that. I think > > you'll have to increase it from 8 to 9. > > > Yes, you are right. > > > We want to either add code to check for such overflows (I have a patch > > ready) or compute MAX_SUBFEATURES dynamically (see ticket #2378, > > probably a better move) to avoid such problems again and again in the > > future. > > > Dynamic computation is definitely much better. I'll wait for your commit > before I commit my changes. Committed, you can go ahead. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
