Hi Jeff, On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:51:08 -0600 (CST), Jeff Rickman wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:20:44 -0600 (CST), Jeff Rickman wrote: > >> # label temp2 "SIO Temp" > > > > This is an internal sensor, it should always be present and correct, so > > why would you ignore it? > > The value is high...very high. Does a flucuating value between 120 and 128 > Celsius make sense? Indeed not. Juerg, you have the datasheet (I think?), I don't, can you please check if temp2 is still internal on the SCH5127? > >> label temp3 "SYS Temp" > >> > >> compute in0 (@ * 0.8), (@ / 0.8) > > Removing this compute line shows a fairly stable in0 value of 1.78 Which I admit isn't very appealing. Make me wonder if the internal scaling factors in the driver are correct. Again, Juerg, I have to defer to you. > > (...) > > Assuming that your CPU does frequency and voltage scaling based on > > load, you should try to put some load on the CPU and check which > > voltage input raises. This would be Vcore (Vccp) and should require no > > scaling. If you can figure that one out, it might help sort out the > > rest. > > I will need to find some type of CPU stress program. Even moving 250,000 > files (about 70+GB) between hard drives inside the chassis using Rsync > only placed <5% load on the CPU. I use "md5sum /dev/zero" for this. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
