On Fri, 08 Oct 2010, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:33:22AM -0400, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > [ ... ] > > The nasty thing about microcode revisions is that they can increase at any > > point in time (although we CAN get notified of it), but I don't think we > > ensure that they cannot go BACK after suspend/resume cycles. Actually, I just checked the code and we do. There are some misleading comments on top of microcode_intel.c. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
