ä 10/8/2010 11:52 AM, Guenter Roeck åé:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:42:05PM -0400, Chen Gong wrote:
ä 10/2/2010 11:26 AM, Guenter Roeck åé:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:59:59AM -0000, Chen Gong wrote:
pkgtemp is derived from coretemp, so some reasonable
logics should be applied onto pkgtemp, too. Such as
the init logic here.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gong<gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
this patch, when applied with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU undefined, causes a compile failure
because it tries to access pkgtemp_cpu_notifier which is not defined in this case.
For that reason, I have removed the patch from the list of applied patches for -next.
Please re-submit a version which compiles for all combinations of HOTPLUG_CPU and SMP
defined/undefined.
Thanks,
Guenter
Sorry for late. I just come back from my holiday. If only this one patch
is applied, it is broken, but it will be OK after these 2 patches are
applied. I tested the patches when CONFIG_SMP is undefined, it does be
Each patch by itself must be compilable, otherwise we break the ability
to bisect. Not a good idea.
Yes, but in fact it is an existing issue, not new incoming. The 1st
patch isn't used for this purpose.
broken again. My suggestion is adding a macro definiton in the pkgtemp.c
like "#include<asm/smp.h>". If it is doable, I will re-post a new patch
series
I assume you mean to add the include directive. Yes, that should do it,
but please make sure that it compiles.
Sure, of course
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
