On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:10:35PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:30:21 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:09:30AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:05:53 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > I like this change a lot, even though it makes the binary module a > > > > little larger. > > > > > > Err, scratch that, it doesn't. Not sure why I thought it did... > > > > > At least it makes the source a bit larger. > > > > One thought: Would it make sense to use initdata for the initialization code ? > > Almost impossible for I2C device drivers, as you never know when > probe() will be called. For example, lm90 could be built into the > kernel, but the underlying i2c bus driver be loaded as a module... > Good point. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
