On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:07:34 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 09/24/10 16:17, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:10:06AM -0400, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > [...] > >> Technically hwmon is orphan (according to MAINTAINERS.) But that's not to > > > > If you pull the latest tree, you'll notice that this is no longer correct. > Excellent! Glad you two have stepped up, sorry for the misinformation. > > I may well have missed it, but if not perhaps a general announce email to the > lm-sensors list to announce it may be worth while to alert anyone like me who > is working on slightly aging branches? (staging-next :) It was posted on the list, but not under a subject line you would notice: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-September/029405.html I should have updated the subject line before replying, sorry about that. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
