On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:26:33AM -0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > PCI specific code is needed only when Atom CPUs are potentially > supported by the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > --- linux-2.6.36-rc4/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig 2010-09-13 08:45:02.000000000 +0200 > +++ 2.6.36-rc4-x86-coretemp-maybe-pci/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig 2010-09-10 16:24:16.000000000 +0200 > @@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ config SENSORS_GL520SM > > config SENSORS_CORETEMP > tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor" > - depends on X86 && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL > + depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL > + depends on PCI || (!MATOM && !GENERIC_CPU && !X86_GENERIC) > help > If you say yes here you get support for the temperature > sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs Resending my reply to this one as well. Again, apologies if there is duplication. The coretemp code unconditionally calls pci functions, even if PCI is not defined. I am concerned that this might cause problems. It might be better to stick with the more generic dependency instead of trying to optimize too much. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
