On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:39:00PM -0700, Jin Dongming wrote:
>
> This patch is used for fixing it. But I have not confirmed this patch
> because I don't have such machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> index d9368ee..169d880 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static __cpuinit int thermal_throttle_add_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev,
> err = sysfs_add_file_to_group(&sys_dev->kobj,
> &attr_core_power_limit_count.attr,
> thermal_attr_group.name);
> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS))
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
> err = sysfs_add_file_to_group(&sys_dev->kobj,
> &attr_package_throttle_count.attr,
> thermal_attr_group.name);
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static __cpuinit int thermal_throttle_add_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev,
> err = sysfs_add_file_to_group(&sys_dev->kobj,
> &attr_package_power_limit_count.attr,
> thermal_attr_group.name);
> + }
>
> return err;
> }
The argument is right. A concise message (e.g. missing { and }) would be better.
Format of this patch is broken. It would be applied to kernel tree. Could you
generate a patch with right format?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
