Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (coretemp) documentation update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chen,

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:50:34 +0800, Chen Gong wrote:
> update coretemp supported CPU TjMax lists and some trivial fixes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/hwmon/coretemp |  102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig        |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp b/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
> index 92267b6..068b39e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Temperature is measured in degrees Celsius and measurement resolution is
>  the actual value of temperature register is in fact a delta from TjMax.
>  
>  Temperature known as TjMax is the maximum junction temperature of processor.
> -Intel defines this temperature as 85C or 100C. At this temperature, protection
> +Intel defines this temperature as 80C or 105C. At this temperature, protection

The new values are just as arbitrary as the original ones. I don't
think it makes sense to give number here, now that we have a detailed
table below.

>  mechanism will perform actions to forcibly cool down the processor. Alarm
>  may be raised, if the temperature grows enough (more than TjMax) to trigger
>  the Out-Of-Spec bit. Following table summarizes the exported sysfs files:
> @@ -38,3 +38,103 @@ temp1_label	 - Contains string "Core X", where X is processor
>  The TjMax temperature is set to 85 degrees C if undocumented model specific
>  register (UMSR) 0xee has bit 30 set. If not the TjMax is 100 degrees C as
>  (sometimes) documented in processor datasheet.
> +
> +Appendix A. Known TjMax lists (TBD):
> +Some information comes from ark.intel.com
> +
> +Process		Processor					TjMax(C)
> +
> +32nm		Core i3/i5/i7 Processors
> +		i7 660UM/640/620, 640LM/620, 620M, 610E		105
> +		i5 540UM/520/430, 540M/520/450/430		105
> +		i3 330E, 370M/350/330				90 rPGA, 105 BGA
> +		i3 330UM					105
> +
> +32nm		Core i7 Extreme Processors
> +		980X						100
> +
> +32nm		Celeron Processors
> +		U3400						105
> +		P4505/P4500 					90
> +
> +45nm		Xeon Processors 5400 Quad-Core
> +		X5492, X5482, X5472, X5470, X5460, X5450	85
> +		E5472, E5462, E5450/40/30/20/10/05		85
> +		L5408						95
> +		L5430, L5420, L5410				70
> +
> +45nm		Xeon Processors 5200 Dual-Core
> +		X5282, X5272, X5270, X5260			90
> +		E5240, E5220, E5205				90
> +		E5205, E5220					70
> +		L5240						70
> +		L5238, L5215					95
> +
> +45nm		Atom Processors
> +		D525/510/425/410				100
> +		Z560/550/540/530P/530/520PT/520/515/510PT/510P	90
> +		Z510/500					90
> +		N475/470/455/450				100
> +		N280/270					90
> +
> +45nm		Core2 Processors
> +		Solo ULV SU3500/3300				100
> +		T9900/9800/9600/9550/9500/9400/9300/8300/8100	105
> +		T6670/6500/6400					105
> +		T6600						90
> +		SU9600/9400/9300				105
> +		SP9600/9400					105
> +		SL9600/9400/9380/9300				105
> +		P9700/9600/9500/8800/8700/8600/8400/7570	105
> +		P7550/7450					90
> +
> +45nm		Core2 Quad Processors
> +		Q9100/9000					100
> +
> +45nm		Core2 Extreme Processors
> +		X9100/9000					105
> +		QX9300						100
> +
> +45nm		Core i3/i5/i7 Processors
> +		i7 940XM/920					100
> +		i7 840QM/820/740/720				100
> +
> +45nm		Celeron Processors
> +		SU2300						100
> +		900 						105
> +
> +65nm		Core2 Duo Processors
> +		Solo U2200, U2100				100
> +		U7700/7600/7500					100
> +		T7800/7700/7600/7500/7400/7300/7250/7200/7100	100
> +		T5870/5670/5600/5550/5500/5470/5450/5300/5270	100
> +		T5250						100
> +		T5800/5750/5200					85
> +		L7700/7500/7400/7300/7200			100
> +
> +65nm		Core2 Extreme Processors
> +		X7900/7800					100
> +
> +65nm		Core Duo Processors
> +		U2500/2400					100
> +		T2700/2600/2450/2400/2350/2300E/2300/2250/2050	100
> +		L2500/2400/2300					100
> +
> +65nm		Core Solo Processors
> +		U1500/1400/1300					100
> +		T1400/1350/1300/1250				100
> +
> +65nm		Xeon Processors 5000 Quad-Core
> +		X5000						90-95
> +		E5000						80
> +		L5000						70
> +		L5318						95
> +
> +65nm		Xeon Processors 5000 Dual-Core
> +		5080, 5063, 5060, 5050, 5030			80-90
> +		5160, 5150, 5148, 5140, 5130, 5120, 5110	80
> +		L5138						100
> +
> +65nm		Celeron Processors
> +		T1700/1600					100
> +		560/550/540/530					100

This is very interesting. Would it also be possible to mark which of
these values the driver is able to figure out automatically, and which
ones it can't? As I understand it, we still have some (old) models for
which the driver doesn't really know and just defaults to an arbitrary
value, right?

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index e19cf8e..d11cf2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ config SENSORS_CORETEMP
>  	help
>  	  If you say yes here you get support for the temperature
>  	  sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs
> -	  are supported. Check documentation/driver for details.
> +	  are supported. Check Documentation/hwmon/coretemp for details.
>  
>  config SENSORS_IBMAEM
>  	tristate "IBM Active Energy Manager temperature/power sensors and control"

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux