On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:31:06AM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 07:53 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/jc42.c b/drivers/hwmon/jc42.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..685057d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/jc42.c
> []
> > +struct jc42_chips {
> > + u16 manid;
> > + u16 devid;
> > + u16 devid_mask;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct jc42_chips jc42_chips[] = {
> > + { ADT_MANID, ADT7408_DEVID, ADT7408_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { IDT_MANID, TS3000B3_DEVID, TS3000B3_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { MAX_MANID, MAX6604_DEVID, MAX6604_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { MCP_MANID, MCP98242_DEVID, MCP98242_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { MCP_MANID, MCP98243_DEVID, MCP98243_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { MCP_MANID, MCP9843_DEVID, MCP9843_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { NXP_MANID, SE97_DEVID, SE97_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { ONS_MANID, CAT6095_DEVID, CAT6095_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { NXP_MANID, SE98_DEVID, SE98_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { STM_MANID, STTS424_DEVID, STTS424_DEVID_MASK },
> > + { STM_MANID, STTS424E_DEVID, STTS424E_DEVID_MASK },
> > +};
> []
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(jc42_chips); i++) {
> > + if (manid == jc42_chips[i].manid
> > + && (devid & jc42_chips[i].devid_mask) ==
> > + jc42_chips[i].devid) {
> > + strlcpy(info->type, "jc42", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Decidedly trivial:
>
> Kernel style seems to prefer having logical tests at
> end of line rather than start of line.
>
Ok. Would be nice to have checkpatch.pl complain about it, though,
if it is a to-be-enforced rule.
> Maybe this bit would be more readable with a temporary:
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(jc42_chips); i++) {
> struct jc42_chips *chip = &jc42_chips[i];
> if (manid == chip->manid &&
> (devid & chip->devid_mask) == chip->devid) {
> strlcpy(info->type, "jc42", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
Agreed. I'll change that.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
