On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:13:45AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:07:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:20:11AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:02:15 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ static const char * w83627ehf_device_names[] = {
> > > > "w83627dhg",
> > > > "w83627dhg",
> > > > "w83667hg",
> > > > + "w83667hg-b",
> > >
> > > Dashes aren't allowed in hwmon device names. For consistency with what
> > > we did for the W83627DHG-Pg, you should simply drop the "-b". It's a small
> > > detail of little interest for the user anyway.
> >
> > Ok. Actually, since the only real difference was in the registers which
> > are not not used anywhere, I'll drop the enum type (w83667hg_b) as well.
>
> Makes sense. It can be added later if needed.
>
> > I'll also add a check for the HG-I.
>
> Do you have a datasheet for that one too?
>
No. However, since we have a tester, we will have test coverage,
so I figured it should be worth a try. If it doesn't work
I can still drop it from the final patch.
I suspect it is the same as the HG with a different chip ID.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
