Hi Ulf, On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 22:46:13 +0200, Ulf Granlund wrote: > However, I have one last question. Since the processor only has two physical cores, butI get four readings, is there some way to tell which values are the ones from the realcores? The coretemp devices are enumerated in the same order as /proc/cpuinfo entries. On my system, the physical cores are enumerated first, and hyper-threaded siblings are listed next, which means I can ignore the second half of the entries. If this is the same for you, then you only care about coretemp.0 and coretemp.1, and can ignore coretemp.2 and coretemp.3. But better double-check with /proc/cpuinfo. Note that I don't think the coretemp driver properly labels the sensors. It enumerates the CPU entries linearly without any check. Not only it is wrong because of HT (which my patch should address) but it also gets wrong on multi-CPU systems, because it should start down from 0 for the second CPU but doesn't. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
