On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 01:09:17 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:43:46PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > For temperatures, we have temp[1-*]_crit, for the critical limit on the > > high end. We don't have a name for the critical limit on the low end, > > because no chip ever implemented that. The name we chose doesn't offer > > FWIW battery monitoring chips are likely to implement under temperature > warnings - the Wolfson chargers do, for example. Low temperature can be > as problematic as high temperature for the chemistry. We already have temp[1-*]_min. We would have to add temp[1-*]_lcrit only if a chip has 2 lower limits, one which is only a warning and one which is critical. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
