Hi Dmitry, On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:09:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Frankly I'd prefer taking input stuff through my tree with the goal of > .36 merge window just to minimize potential merge issues. This is a > simple cleanup patch that has no dependencies, so there is little gain > from doing it all in one go. If I take the patch in my i2c tree, the aim is to merge it upstream immediately, so merge issues won't exist. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
