Hi Ira, On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:06:01 -0700, Ira W. Snyder wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:59:27PM -0700, Ira W. Snyder wrote: > > This patch series fixes support for using a GPIO line as an analog input to > > the ADC on the LTC4245 chip. Jean suggested dropping support for multiple > > GPIO lines, and then adding it back as an optional feature. > > > > I think this is fairly unintrusive to the ltc4245 code, and the multi-GPIO > > support is well encapsulated in a seperate function, hidden behind a kernel > > configuration option. > > > > I have tested the sensors utility with the -EAGAIN code for stale values. > > The output looks like this: > > > > ltc4245-i2c-1-22 > > 12V Input: +11.66 V > > 5.0V Input: +5.10 V > > 3.3V Input: +3.19 V > > VEE Input: +0.00 V > > 12V Output: +11.66 V > > 5.0V Output: +5.08 V > > 3.3V Output: +3.19 V > > VEE Output: +0.00 V > > Dig 3.30v Output: +3.26 V > > ERROR: Can't get value of subfeature in10_input: Can't read > > Dig 2.25v Output: +0.00 V > > ERROR: Can't get value of subfeature in11_input: Can't read > > Dig 1.80v Output: +0.00 V > > 12V Power: 816.20 mW > > 5.0V Power: 4.90 W > > 3.3V Power: 1.44 W > > VEE Power: 0.00 nW > > 12V Current: +0.07 A > > 5.0V Current: +0.96 A > > 3.3V Current: +0.45 A > > VEE Current: +0.00 A > > > > Using cat to read the inX_input nodes, I get the expected output: > > > > cat: in9_input: Resource temporarily unavailable > > > > So I think that the lm-sensors software will handle this method of showing > > stale values just fine. > > > > Hey Jean, > > Have you had time to look at this patch series yet? I'm sorry, this has been on the back burner for quite some time now :( I still hope to get your patches reviewed in time for 2.6.35. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
