Re: [PATCH]BUG FIX: hwmon applesmc.c add iMac9, 1 and MacBookPro2, 2 to fix bug 14429

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/12/2010 12:45 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Justin,

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:43:22 -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
This patch adds the iMac9,1 and the MacBookPro2,2
temperature sensors to hwmon applesmc.c to fix bug entry:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14429

Nicely filled under component IA64, no surprise I didn't see it. I've
just fixed it.

Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
index c1605b5..5e762ac 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ static const char *temperature_sensors_sets[][41] = {
  	  "TM1S", "TM2P", "TM2S", "TM3S", "TM8P", "TM8S", "TM9P", "TM9S",
  	  "TN0C", "TN0D", "TN0H", "TS0C", "Tp0C", "Tp1C", "Tv0S", "Tv1S",
  	  NULL },
+/* Set 17: iMac9,1 */
+	{ "TA0P", "TC0D", "TC0H", "TC0P", "TG0D", "TG0H", "TH0P", "TL0P",
+	  "TN0D", "TN0H", "TN0P", "TO0P", "Tm0P", "Tp0P", NULL },
+/* Set 18: MacBookPro2,2 */
+	{ "TB0T", "TC0D", "TC0P", "TG0H", "TG0P", "TG0T", "TM0P", "TTF0",
+	  "Th0H", "Th1H", "Tm0P", "Ts0P", NULL },
  };

  /* List of keys used to read/write fan speeds */
@@ -1350,6 +1356,10 @@ static __initdata struct dmi_match_data applesmc_dmi_data[] = {
  	{ .accelerometer = 1, .light = 1, .temperature_set = 15 },
  /* MacPro3,1: temperature set 16 */
  	{ .accelerometer = 0, .light = 0, .temperature_set = 16 },
+/* iMac9,1: light sensor only, temperature set 17 */
+	{ .accelerometer = 0, .light = 0, .temperature_set = 17 },
+/* MacBookPro2,2: accelerometer, backlight and temperature set 18 */
+	{ .accelerometer = 1, .light = 1, .temperature_set = 18 },
  };

  /* Note that DMI_MATCH(...,"MacBook") will match "MacBookPro1,1".
@@ -1375,6 +1385,10 @@ static __initdata struct dmi_system_id applesmc_whitelist[] = {
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Apple"),
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "MacBookPro3") },
  		&applesmc_dmi_data[9]},
+	{ applesmc_dmi_match, "Apple MacBookPro2,2", {
+	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Apple Computer, Inc."),
+	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "MacBookPro2,2") },
+		&applesmc_dmi_data[18]},
  	{ applesmc_dmi_match, "Apple MacBook Pro", {
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR,"Apple"),
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME,"MacBookPro") },
@@ -1415,6 +1429,10 @@ static __initdata struct dmi_system_id applesmc_whitelist[] = {
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Apple"),
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "MacPro") },
  		&applesmc_dmi_data[4]},
+	{ applesmc_dmi_match, "Apple iMac9,1", {
+	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Apple Inc."),
+	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "iMac9,1") },
+		&applesmc_dmi_data[17]},
  	{ applesmc_dmi_match, "Apple iMac 8", {
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Apple"),
  	  DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "iMac8") },

Patch applied, queued for 2.6.34, thanks.

Nicolas, as the maintainer of this driver, I would like to get your
ack, at least.



Cool!!, thank you for taking the
time to review.

as for the patch, just to let you know the
differences between the two(the patch submitted
yesterday, and on the bug report)
is the iMac9,1 wasn't sure if I should
use 9,1 or not i.g. iMac 8,
either case both patches work.

Justin P. Mattock

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux