Hi Matthew,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:52:30 -0500, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Recent Intel chipsets have support for a PCI device providing access
> to on-board thermal monitoring. Previous versions have merely used this
> to allow the BIOS to set trip points, but Ibex Peak documents a set of
> registers to read values. This driver implements an hwmon interface to
> read them.
Review:
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> The CPU temperature is somewhat off on the test hardware I have here - I'm
> in the process of determining whether the BIOS has programmed incorrect
> values or whether I'm missing a correction step.
Any progress on this?
> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c | 376 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is a rather generic driver name, for a device-specific driver.
> 4 files changed, 392 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 98d5ca1..e038300 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2821,6 +2821,12 @@ F: drivers/net/igb/
> F: drivers/net/ixgb/
> F: drivers/net/ixgbe/
>
> +INTEL PCI THERMAL SUBSYSTEM DRIVER
This is a simple device driver. Having "subsystem" in the name is very
confusing.
> +M: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +L: lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +S: Maintained
> +F: drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c
> +
> INTEL PRO/WIRELESS 2100 NETWORK CONNECTION SUPPORT
> M: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
> M: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index 9e640c6..f923f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -414,6 +414,15 @@ config SENSORS_IBMPEX
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called ibmpex.
>
> +config SENSORS_INTEL
Way too generic option name. We support other Intel sensors already,
which are not supported by this driver. See the coretemp and i5k_amb
drivers for example.
> + tristate "Intel Thermal Subsystem"
Bad indentation. And again a very generic option label...
> + help
> + Driver for the Intel Thermal Subsystem found in some PM55-based
> + machines.
... for what seems to be a highly specific device driver. If this
driver only works on Intel PM55-based boards, the driver name should
reflect this. Even if it works on all PM55 and later chips, having pm55
in the driver name is recommended.
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
> + be called intel_thermal.
> +
> config SENSORS_IT87
> tristate "ITE IT87xx and compatibles"
> select HWMON_VID
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> index 33c2ee1..a138df9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_HDAPS) += hdaps.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_I5K_AMB) += i5k_amb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMAEM) += ibmaem.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMPEX) += ibmpex.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_INTEL) += intel_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87) += it87.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_K8TEMP) += k8temp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3LV02D) += lis3lv02d.o hp_accel.o
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c b/drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9b8296e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/intel_thermal.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
This is harsh. Where's the driver description, author name, copyright
year, GPL boilerplate, as every other driver in the kernel tree has?
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
You don't need this one for a PCI driver.
> +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> +#define INTEL_THERMAL_SENSOR_TEMP 0x03
> +#define INTEL_THERMAL_CORE_TEMP 0x30
> +#define INTEL_THERMAL_PROCESSOR_TEMP 0x60
> +#define INTEL_THERMAL_DIMM_TEMP 0xb0
> +#define INTEL_THERMAL_INTERNAL_TEMP 0xd8
> +
> +static void __iomem *intel_thermal_addr;
> +static struct device *intel_thermal_dev;
Global variables? You must be kidding. Please move these to a
per-device structure, which you will pass to functions which need it.
> +
> +static struct pci_device_id intel_thermal_pci_ids[] = {
I think these can be marked const these days.
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3b32) },
> + { 0, }
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, intel_thermal_pci_ids);
> +
> +struct intel_thermal_sensor {
> + int (*read_sensor)(void);
> + char *name;
> + struct attribute_group *attrs;
> +};
> +
> +static struct intel_thermal_sensor intel_thermal_sensors[];
> +
> +static ssize_t intel_thermal_sensor_label(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + int sensor = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", intel_thermal_sensors[sensor].name);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t intel_thermal_sensor_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + int sensor = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
> + intel_thermal_sensors[sensor].read_sensor());
This doesn't properly handle errors. Some read_sensor() functions
return -1 on error, so you have to handle that. If you don't, you will
return a temperature of -0.001 degrees C, which user-space has no
reason to handle as an error.Depending on the nature of the error, you
want to return -EAGAIN or -ENXIO here.
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_sensor_temp(void)
> +{
> + int value = readb(intel_thermal_addr + INTEL_THERMAL_SENSOR_TEMP);
> +
> + if (value > 0x7f)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return value * 1000;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_core_temp(int core)
> +{
> + int temp;
> + int value;
> +
> + value = readw(intel_thermal_addr + INTEL_THERMAL_CORE_TEMP + 2 * core);
> +
> + if (!value || (value & 0x8000))
> + return -1;
> +
> + temp = ((value & 0xffc0) >> 6) * 1000;
> + temp += ((value & 0x3f) * 1000) / 64;
This is a fairly complex way to write:
temp = value * 1000 / 64;
Isn't it?
> +
> + return temp;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_core0_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_core_temp(0);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_core1_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_core_temp(1);
> +}
This is pretty inefficient. Please add a parameter to struct
intel_thermal_sensor and have that parameter passed to read_sensor().
That way you can share the same function amongst different sensors,
without intermediate functions hard-coding a parameter.
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_processor_temp(void)
> +{
> + int value = readw(intel_thermal_addr + INTEL_THERMAL_PROCESSOR_TEMP);
> +
> + return (value & 0xff) * 1000;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_dimm_temp(int dimm)
> +{
> + int value = readl(intel_thermal_addr + INTEL_THERMAL_DIMM_TEMP);
> + int shift = dimm * 8;
> + int temp = (value & (0xff << shift)) >> shift;
What about:
int temp = (value >> shift) & 0xff;
This is easier to read IMHO.
> +
> + if (!temp || temp == 0xff)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return temp * 1000;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_dimm0_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_dimm_temp(0);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_dimm1_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_dimm_temp(1);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_dimm2_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_dimm_temp(2);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_dimm3_temp(void)
> +{
> + return intel_thermal_dimm_temp(3);
> +}
This illustrates my previous point even better...
> +
> +static int intel_thermal_internal_temp(void)
> +{
> + int value = readl(intel_thermal_addr + INTEL_THERMAL_INTERNAL_TEMP);
> + int temp = value & 0xff;
> +
> + if (!temp)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return temp * 1000;
> +}
> +
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 0);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 0);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 1);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 1);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 2);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 2);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 3);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 3);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp5_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 4);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp5_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 4);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp6_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 5);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp6_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 5);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp7_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 6);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp7_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 6);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp8_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 7);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp8_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 7);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp9_input, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_show, NULL, 8);
> +SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp9_label, S_IRUGO, intel_thermal_sensor_label, NULL, 8);
> +
> +static struct attribute *sensor_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
Comma not needed after a list terminator (you're never going to add
something after it, by definition.)
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_sensor_attribute_group = {
Should be const, and same for all other groups.
> + .attrs = sensor_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *core0_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_core0_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = core0_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *core1_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_core1_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = core1_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *processor_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_processor_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = processor_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *dimm0_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp5_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp5_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_dimm0_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = dimm0_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *dimm1_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp6_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp6_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_dimm1_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = dimm1_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *dimm2_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp7_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp7_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_dimm2_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = dimm2_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *dimm3_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp8_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp8_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_dimm3_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = dimm3_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute *internal_attributes[] = {
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp9_input.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp9_label.dev_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group intel_internal_attribute_group = {
> + .attrs = internal_attributes,
> +};
> +
> +static struct intel_thermal_sensor intel_thermal_sensors[] = {
> + {intel_thermal_sensor_temp, "thermal sensor",
> + &intel_sensor_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_core0_temp, "core 0", &intel_core0_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_core1_temp, "core 1", &intel_core1_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_processor_temp, "processor",
> + &intel_processor_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_dimm0_temp, "dimm 0", &intel_dimm0_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_dimm1_temp, "dimm 1", &intel_dimm1_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_dimm2_temp, "dimm 2", &intel_dimm2_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_dimm3_temp, "dimm 3", &intel_dimm3_attribute_group},
> + {intel_thermal_internal_temp, "internal temperature",
> + &intel_internal_attribute_group},
Alignment.
> + {0, },
Should be NULL, not 0. (And you could easily live without that
terminator, BTW.)
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "intel\n");
What an horribly vague identifier :(
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(name, S_IRUGO, show_name, NULL);
> +
> +static int __devinit intel_thermal_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + ret = pci_request_region(pdev, 0, "Intel Thermal Subsystem");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request region\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
Or the region might be already in use? You'd rather return "ret" than
hard-code an arbitrary error code.
> + }
> +
> + intel_thermal_addr = pci_ioremap_bar(pdev, 0);
> + if (!intel_thermal_addr) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remap registers\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; intel_thermal_sensors[i].read_sensor != NULL; i++) {
> + int temp = intel_thermal_sensors[i].read_sensor();
> +
> + if (temp <= 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> + intel_thermal_sensors[i].attrs);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create attrs\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
Once again, you'd rather pass down the error code you received.
> + goto device;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = device_create_file(&pdev->dev, &dev_attr_name);
> +
> + if (ret) {
No blank line between function call and error test.
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create attr\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto device;
Wrong label... you want to jump to "groups" not "device".
> + }
> +
> + intel_thermal_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!intel_thermal_dev) {
This is the wrong test. hwmon_device_register() returns pointer-encoded
error values, so you need IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR().
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create hwmon device\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto groups;
But here you want to jump to "device" and not "groups".
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
A blank line here wouldn't hurt.
> +device:
> + device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &dev_attr_name);
> + hwmon_device_unregister(intel_thermal_dev);
You don't want to call this here, as you'll jump here only if
hwmon_device_register() failed, so you don't have to undo it.
> +groups:
> + for (i = 0; intel_thermal_sensors[i].read_sensor; i++) {
> + sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> + intel_thermal_sensors[i].attrs);
> + }
> + iounmap(intel_thermal_addr);
> +release:
> + pci_release_region(pdev, 0);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void __devexit intel_thermal_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &dev_attr_name);
> +
> + for (i = 0; intel_thermal_sensors[i].read_sensor; i++) {
> + sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> + intel_thermal_sensors[i].attrs);
> + }
> +
> + hwmon_device_unregister(intel_thermal_dev);
> +
> + iounmap(intel_thermal_addr);
> + pci_release_region(pdev, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct pci_driver intel_thermal_pci_driver = {
> + .name = "intel-thermal",
> + .id_table = intel_thermal_pci_ids,
> + .probe = intel_thermal_pci_probe,
> + .remove = intel_thermal_pci_remove,
As intel_thermal_pci_remove is marked __devexit, you should use
__devexit_p().
> +};
> +
> +static int __init intel_thermal_init(void)
> +{
> + return pci_register_driver(&intel_thermal_pci_driver);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit intel_thermal_exit(void)
> +{
> + pci_unregister_driver(&intel_thermal_pci_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(intel_thermal_init)
> +module_exit(intel_thermal_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel thermal subsystem hwmon driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Update wanted, if you want this upstream, obviously...
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
