ACPI people, Do you have any objection to the patch below, or can I push it upstream? On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:56:36 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > When the user passes the kernel parameter acpi_enforce_resources=lax, > the ACPI resources are no longer protected, so a native driver can > make use of them. In that case, we do not want the asus_atk0110 to be > loaded. Unfortunately, this driver loads automatically due to its > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE, so the user ends up with two drivers loaded for > the same device - this is bad. > > So I suggest that we prevent the asus_atk0110 driver from loading if > acpi_enforce_resources=lax. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Luca, what do you think? I had the idea to write this patch after > seeing this bug report: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580988 > I'm not sure if the driver conflict is the root cause of the problem, > but it certainly did not help. > > Another approach would be to hide the ATK0110 ACPI device itself, but I > don't know if it is possible? > > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 9 +++++++++ > drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c | 7 +++++++ > include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > --- linux-2.6.34-rc1.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2010-03-09 08:24:52.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.34-rc1/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2010-03-09 13:38:49.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1206,6 +1206,15 @@ int acpi_check_mem_region(resource_size_ > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_mem_region); > > /* > + * Let drivers know whether the resource checks are effective > + */ > +int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void) > +{ > + return acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_resources_are_enforced); > + > +/* > * Acquire a spinlock. > * > * handle is a pointer to the spinlock_t. > --- linux-2.6.34-rc1.orig/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c 2010-02-25 09:12:22.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.34-rc1/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c 2010-03-09 13:23:50.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1406,6 +1406,13 @@ static int __init atk0110_init(void) > { > int ret; > > + /* Make sure it's safe to access the device through ACPI */ > + if (!acpi_resources_are_enforced()) { > + pr_err("atk: Resources not safely usable due to " > + "acpi_enforce_resources kernel parameter\n"); > + return -EBUSY; > + } > + > ret = acpi_bus_register_driver(&atk_driver); > if (ret) > pr_info("atk: acpi_bus_register_driver failed: %d\n", ret); > --- linux-2.6.34-rc1.orig/include/linux/acpi.h 2010-02-25 09:13:22.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.34-rc1/include/linux/acpi.h 2010-03-09 13:46:33.000000000 +0100 > @@ -247,6 +247,8 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t st > int acpi_check_mem_region(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n, > const char *name); > > +int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void); > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void); > void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void); > > -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
