Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Get TjMax value from MSR for i series CPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17:19 Fri 05 Mar, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I'm not a native speaker but "assumption value" doesn't seem correct to me.
> "assumed value" maybe? Or even better (IMHO) "default value"?
> 

I meant the TjMax value may not be correct, the "default value" may mislead
the user into thinking it is correct. I googled the "assumption value", and
found they are used in some sentences, so I use them too :P


Hi Jean,

Do you have any comments on the two patches? I'll make another patch to
update documents if they are accepted.


Thanks
Huaxu

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux