Hi Sean, On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:55:37 -0500 (EST), Sean Fidler wrote: > Sensors output: > > smsc47m192-i2c-0-2d > Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1880 > +2.5V: +0.00 V (min = +2.90 V, max = +2.90 V) ALARM > VCore: +0.00 V (min = +2.99 V, max = +2.99 V) ALARM > +3.3V: +0.00 V (min = +4.38 V, max = +4.35 V) ALARM > +5V: +0.00 V (min = +6.64 V, max = +6.64 V) ALARM > +12V: +3.12 V (min = +15.81 V, max = +15.88 V) ALARM > VCC: +3.35 V (min = +4.38 V, max = +3.83 V) ALARM > +1.5V: +0.05 V (min = +1.49 V, max = +1.99 V) ALARM > +1.8V: +0.00 V (min = +2.39 V, max = +2.39 V) ALARM > Chip Temp: +34.0°C (low = -17.0°C, high = -1.0°C) ALARM > CPU Temp: +28.0°C (low = -1.0°C, high = -33.0°C) ALARM > Sys Temp: FAULT (low = -65.0°C, high = -1.0°C) ALARM > cpu0_vid: +1.475 V Not many inputs wired, and the min voltage and high temperature limits are pretty wrong, but other than that it's not too bad, except for +12V. Do the temperature values appear to match anything you've seen in the BIOS? > smsc47m1-isa-0600 > Adapter: ISA adapter > fan1: 2925 RPM (min = 2560 RPM, div = 2) ALARM > fan2: 0 RPM (min = 3072 RPM, div = 4) ALARM Looks reasonable. Only one fan on this system? If there are more, you can try increasing fan2_div to 8 if the other fan is a slow one. I guess that the first ALARM wears off when running "sensors" again? 2925 is above the min limit so there should be no ALARM. >From the above output, the following configuration section would seem appropriate for your system: chip "smsc47m192-i2c-*-2d" ignore in0 ignore in1 ignore in2 ignore in3 label in5 "+3.3V" ignore in6 ignore in7 set in4_min 0 set in5_min 3.3 * 0.95 set in5_max 3.3 * 1.05 ignore temp3 set temp1_min 5 set temp1_max 50 set temp2_min 5 set temp2_max 50 Needs to be confirmed: * What is wired on in4. * Temperature input labels. * Whether cpu0_vid is real. What CPU is there on this machine? * Which fan is connected to fan1. * Is there anything connected to fan2. If you can answer the questions above then we can put a good configuration file for your machine on the wiki. > I wouldn't mind test kernel patches. I'll have to figure out how to > implement them, but I think I'll be able to manage *fingers crossed*. Whatever I can do to > help. I've put a modified smsc47m1 driver here: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/smsc47m1/ I would like you to download it and test it. With that driver, you should no longer have to do the isaset magic at boot time. It include other changes which should hopefully be transparent to you if I didn't mess up. This is a standalone driver, you'll need a proper build environment (install make, gcc and the kernel headers) then type "make" then load the driver (with insmod.) -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
