Re: atk0110/BIOS discrepancies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:28 PM, false <spmurphy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It seems likely. Note that the driver retrieves the label strings
>>> directly from the system firmware (ACPI), it does not make them up;
>>> those labels are used by Asus windows utility so I'd trust them.
>>> Can you send me a dump of your DSDT table
>>> (/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT)?
>>
>> Attached is a gz of 3 files from that directory.
> [...]
> The dump puzzles me... I understand that this is a very new motherboard, right?
[...]
> The interfaces were reverse engineered so I'm probably missing
> something (a version field, a feature bitmap, ...) for better
> selecting the interface... will look into this.

Simon, are you able (and willing) to compile an external module?
I'd like you to try some tweaks on the driver.

Luca

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux