Hi Darrick, On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:09:00 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > At the light of all this, I think I'd keep the adt7475 driver and merge > > ADT7473 support therein. If anyone can think of good reasons to do it > > the other way around, please speak up. > > Sounds like a good idea to me. I'll do that then. When I'm done, I'll ask you to test the result, as I presume you have access to a live ADT7473 chip. What about attribute pwm_use_point2_pwm_at_crit? It doesn't sound terribly useful to me, but OTOH you did implement it in the adt7473 driver, and writable at that, so maybe you had the need. Do you want me to add this feature to the adt7475 driver? -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
