Hello Rudolf
Yes. I think Huaxu and I can take this, even though I am still on the way
to acquire enough documents from hardware team. As I have a lot of processors
on hand to test, maybe it's better to gain more coverage in coretemp driver.
Please let me know what I need to do regarding to take the maintainership.
We are not experienced in doing so.
Thanks,
Kent
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:24:51PM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks good. However I would like to see the Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
> updated too.
>
> Maybe Intel can overtake the driver maintainership because I'm quite
> struggling to get any info from Intel. Second reason is lack of free
> time.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Rudolf
>
> Huaxu Wan napsal(a):
>> Add Lynnfield processor support. Lynnfield is a quad-core Nehalem based microprocessor for Desktop market, which is introduced in September 2009.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Kent Liu <kent.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
>> index 93c1722..a9a21dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
>> @@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ static int __init coretemp_init(void)
>> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
>>
>> - /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A */
>> + /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A, 0x1E */
>> if ((c->cpuid_level < 0) || (c->x86 != 0x6) ||
>> !((c->x86_model == 0xe) || (c->x86_model == 0xf) ||
>> (c->x86_model == 0x16) || (c->x86_model == 0x17) ||
>> - (c->x86_model == 0x1A))) {
>> + (c->x86_model == 0x1A) || (c->x86_model == 0x1E))) {
>>
>> /* supported CPU not found, but report the unknown
>> family 6 CPU */
>> --
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
