On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:15:33 +0300, Stefan Catruna wrote: >> Here are 2 consecutise "sensors" run: >> >> # sensors >> coretemp-isa-0000 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 0: +73.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM >> >> coretemp-isa-0001 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 1: +68.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0002 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 2: +69.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM >> >> coretemp-isa-0003 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 3: +71.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM >> >> # sensors >> coretemp-isa-0000 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 0: +72.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM >> >> coretemp-isa-0001 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 1: +67.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0002 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 2: +67.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM >> >> coretemp-isa-0003 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 3: +70.0°C (high = +74.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) ALARM > > This is odd. Rudolf, do you know why alarm flags are set while > temperatures are below the high limits? > >> PS: lm-sensors was installed from repository >> # sensors -v >> sensors version 3.0.2 with libsensors version 3.0.2 > > Kernel version is useful as well. # uname -a Linux 2.6.28-11-server #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 02:45:36 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> PPS: I'm having some problems with the temperature, it reached even 100 > > Not good. Maybe your fans aren't spinning fast enough? If you are doing > fan speed control, try without it for a moment. I'm not using fan speed control, set them to Aggressive in BIOS and the temp is still high ... > -- > Jean Delvare > http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
