Re: "No sensors found!" on Intel Entry Storage System SS4200

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 01 September 2009 23:27:28 Tech2009 wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestions.
>
> I looked in sysfs on the factory distro, no sign of dme1737 there (see
> attached). However there are other i2c devices not on my debian
> install...you could be right about the direct port io, but without
> disassembling the library it's hard to tell.
>
> I tried loading dme1737 with force_start, but that made no difference
> for me.
I was thinking about using the 'force' parameter to givie the address 
explicitly to the module, the device may be on non standard port.
sensors-detect is usually more capable of detecting devices than kernel 
modules
>
> I'm going to have to determine whether the problem is with the sensors
> program or the dme1737 driver. Is there a way to make the dme1737 module
> dump out the debug information present in the source code?
Haven't read the source of this module, but you'll probably have to compile 
kernel (or at least the module) with different .config (one that enables 
debugging messages)
>
> I'm going to see if I can use the dme1737.c module source to read the
> information via standard i2c calls in userland (ie i2ctools). If this
> does work, I will be at a loss as to why the dme1737 module + sensors
> program aren't working, but at least I'll have a viable alternative.
>
> I will let you know if it works.
I'm just a random lm-sensors user, so it's more of the blind leading the blind 
case and educated guess than real inside knowledge about lm-sensors...
Though there are other readers from the list that will benefit from this 
information
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:26 +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 August 2009 18:03:36 Tech2009 wrote:
> > > > Message: 3
> > > > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:30:25 +0200
> > > > From: Hubert Kario <hka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: Re:  "No sensors found!" on Intel Entry Storage
> > > > System SS4200
> > > > To: lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Message-ID: <200908291030.25637.hka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-2"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and what shows dmesg?
> > >
> > > dmesg output after sensors-detect:
> > > [ 1815.988770] i2c /dev entries driver
> > >
> > > dmesg output after sensors:
> > > (blank)
> >
> > So there doesn't appear to be any problem...
> >
> > > The bundled Linux image does not appear to use the dme1737 module or
> > > lmsensors. The web interface loads several closed source libraries, and
> > > I'm not sure how they access the hardware.
> >
> > They may access the hardware directly, is the web interface running as
> > root? Also, you may check /sys file system, look in
> > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/ for it, the module may be compiled in in the
> > bundled image
> >
> > > Is there something I should try to determine why sensors-detect sees
> > > the chip but sensors does not?
> >
> > you could try one of the parameters aviable for the module, for list of
> > all of them, run:
> > modinfo dme1737

-- 
Hubert Kario
QBS - Quality Business Software
ul. Ksawerów 30/85
02-656 Warszawa
POLAND
tel. +48 (22) 646-61-51, 646-74-24
fax +48 (22) 646-61-50


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux