On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:42:57 -0700
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> This driver exposes ACPI 4.0 compliant power meters as hardware monitoring
> devices. This second revision of the driver also exports the ACPI string
> info as sysfs attributes, a list of the devices that the meter measures,
> and will send ACPI notifications over the ACPI netlink socket.
>
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t set_avg_interval(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
> + struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource = acpi_dev->driver_data;
> + union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
> + struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
> + int res;
> + unsigned long temp;
> + unsigned long long data;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + res = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &temp);
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + if (temp > resource->caps.max_avg_interval ||
> + temp < resource->caps.min_avg_interval)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + arg0.integer.value = temp;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&resource->lock);
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PAI",
> + &args, &data);
> + if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + resource->avg_interval = temp;
> + mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PAI"));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (data)
> + return -EINVAL;
I find this test of `data' inexplicable. Is it just me, or do we need
a comment here?
> + return count;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t set_cap(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
> + struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource = acpi_dev->driver_data;
> + union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
> + struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
> + int res;
> + unsigned long temp;
> + unsigned long long data;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + res = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &temp);
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + temp /= 1000;
> + if (temp > resource->caps.max_cap || temp < resource->caps.min_cap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + arg0.integer.value = temp;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&resource->lock);
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_SHL",
> + &args, &data);
> + if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + resource->cap = temp;
> + mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _SHL"));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (data)
> + return -EINVAL;
ditto.
> + return count;
> +}
> +
